A National Disgrace: Canada’s shameful position on the right to water
The Canadian government has tarnished
its reputation on the world
stage by continuing to oppose
attempts to enshrine the right to water
at the United Nations.
At the World Water Forum at The
Hague in 2000, in Kyoto in 2003, and
in Mexico City in 2006, Canada refused
to recognize water as a human right. In
2002 and 2003, Canada was the only
country to vote against United Nations
(UN) resolutions on the human right to water, stating,
“Canada does not accept that there is a right to drinking
water and sanitation.” The Harper government also
played a key role in blocking a motion by Germany and
Spain to officially recognize water as a human right at the
UN Human Rights Council in March 2008.
On several occasions UN member states have pushed
for recognition of the human right to water. Each time
Canada rejected the efforts. Most recently, the Bolivian
government has put forward a UN resolution for the human
right to water and sanitation, which will be considered
in late July 2010. The resolution has been endorsed
by several other countries. The Canadian government,
however, has not supported the resolution and may even
be lobbying other countries to weaken it. |
|

– Download fact sheet PDF
|
While the Canadian government has declared that water
is an important issue, and that countries are responsible
for ensuring that their own populations have access to
water, the government has also clearly stated that it does
not believe that international law should recognize the
existence of a right to water. In the lead-up to the recent
G8 and G20 summits held in Canada, Prime Minister
Harper spoke about the importance of – and his government’s
commitment to – maternal and infant health.
Death from preventable water-borne diseases continues
to be a leading cause of death for children under five
in some areas of the Global South
– deaths that could be prevented if
water was declared a human right.
Background – The pressure mounts
Access to clean, fresh water is essential
for people and nature, and the UN
is now recognizing this as an urgent
issue. In September 2007, at the 6th
Session of the UN Human Rights Council,
the High Commissioner for Human
Rights, Canadian Louise Arbour, presented her report
outlining states’ obligations under the right to water.
Madame Arbour’s report called for stronger regulations
governing water companies, including penalties for corporations
that commit human rights abuses and restrict
peoples’ right to water.
In May 2006, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights rebuked Canada for its position on the
right to water, saying it “regretted” Canada’s continued
opposition, and called on Canada to review its stand. The
United Kingdom has reversed its initial opposition to the
right to water and is now a supporter. Canada is becoming
increasingly isolated asa groing number of states
recognize the right to water.
The crisis
The global water crisis is already upon us. This crisis is not
only due to water scarcity, but also because the international
community has failed to adequately manage and
provide water for all.
When the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights
was written, no one could foresee a day when water
would be a contested area. But in 2010, it is not an exaggeration
to say that the lack of access to clean water is
the greatest human rights violation in the world. Nearly
two billion people live in water-stressed areas and three
billion have no running water within a kilometre of their
homes. Every eight seconds a child dies of a water-borne
disease, in every case preventable if there was access to
clean water and adequate sanitation. And it is getting
worse as the world runs out of clean water. A new World
Bank reports says that by 2030, global demand for water
will exceed supply by 40 per cent.
The solution
A binding convention on the right to water would outline
the responsibility of international governments to
provide safe drinking water for all people, regardless of
the community or country they live in. Most importantly,
water would be recognized as a fundamental right. This
would ensure that access to safe water is not determined
by one’s ability to pay for it.
A UN convention on the right to water would establish
clear reporting and redress mechanisms. It would also
help put a stop to the rampant pollution, depletion and
abuse of our water sources. States would be required to
provide access to clean water and basic sanitation to all
peoples within their borders. A convention would not
require countries to provide water to others.
Guarantees
The global water crisis calls for good governance and for
the political will to act. A UN Convention on the Right to
Water could help guarantee that:
- Governments (not private companies) ensure access to
safe water for drinking, food preparation and sanitation.
- Water is protected as a public trust and delivered as a
public service on a not-for-profit basis.
- Environmental protections are instituted, ensuring a
safe water supply.
- Water sources are preserved and protected from overuse,
pollution, and diversions.
While the Bolivian resolution is not a binding convention,
it is a beginning, and it will bring more attention and
understanding to the importance of making water a human
right. It’s not too late for the Canadian government
to reverse its position and become a champion for this
fundamental right.
For more information about The Council of Canadians’ right to water campaign, please call 1-800-387-7177, or visit our websites at www.blueplanetproject.net and www.canadians.org.
– Download fact sheet PDF