The Council of Canadians
 
   

Trade topics

Trade index

Canada-EU FTA (CETA)

Perimeter Security

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Buy American Sellout

Canada-Colombia FTA

G8/G20

NAFTA-SPP

Interprovincial Trade Agreements

International trade


Trade talk

Trade BLOG posts »


Support our work

Make a donation and join us in acting for social justice »
We do our work without a penny of corporate or government funding, relying instead on the support of generous individuals like you to run our campaigns. Please donate today!

Campaign wins »


Search



Follow us on...

E-newsletter & updates:

ACTIVlist for daily news updates:

 

 

NAFTA/UPS Constitutional Challenge Fact Sheets

What is at stake?

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Chapter 11, deals explicitly with investment (rather than trade) and most importantly includes a mechanism for dealing with "investor-state" disputes. These are disputes between corporations and governments, and they allow foreign corporations to sue governments directly whenever they think their "rights" have been violated by a particular government measure, regulation or public interest legislation. Corporations have used chapter 11 to challenge environmental laws, municipal land-use controls, water protection measures, activities of public service providers like Canada Post and even the decisions of juries and appellate courts.

Why are we challenging Chapter 11?

We are NOT talking about dispute between a government a company over a breach of contract or about a traditional “expropriation” of private assets. NAFTA goes much further. The key to the investor-state provision is NAFTA's extremely broad definition of "expropriation." By narrow legal definition, expropriation means the actual "taking" of private property, almost always land. But a well-organized effort by corporations in the US during the Reagan era led to a series of Supreme Court decisions that expanded this narrow legal definition to include what is now called "regulatory taking." This definition now includes any government regulatory action (law, regulation, rule or policy) that reduces the commercial value of an investment or the expected profit from an investment - including future profits. This new definition of expropriation has found its way into NAFTA's Chapter 11. In effect, Chapter 11's dispute settlement provisions give foreign corporations the right to directly enforce an international treaty signed by sovereign governments, under which the corporations have absolutely no obligations. This underlines the fact that these trade agreements are primarily aimed at restricting governments from regulating or controlling corporations.

NAFTA Constitutional Challenge fact sheets (PDF):

       
 

More UPS/NAFTA documents:

 

   
The Council of Canadians  
updated November 4, 2006
 
 
 

Bookmark and Share

home | contact | privacy | site map | events | français
700-170 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, ON, K1P 5V5 CA; Tel: (613) 233-2773; 1-800-387-7177
Fax: (613) 233-6776; inquiries@canadians.org; © The Council of Canadians